Dan P. McAdams and Jennifer L. Pals
The Big Idea
One chronic problem with depending on research results as an aid to coaching practice is the practice of research itself. All too often researchers are engaged in an on-going competitive practice of their own: grand theory building. The theories themselves are generally not that complicated, but the continuous defence of them against adversaries creates a good simulation of a contact sport. A consequence is perpetual uncertainty regarding whether there is progressive improvement in our understanding of the issue or problem at hand.
In the case of personality psychology, such has been the case. Its history is a lengthy roll call of one research personality after another getting into the fray, proposing yet another possible explanation of what makes human beings tick, maybe leading the league for a while, only to be replaced by another upstart researcher with a more attractive game plan.
The authors of this paper aim to do better. They put forward a far-reaching, comprehensive and integrated account of what the field itself is about: finding an integrative...
Get access to all exclusive
members content now.
Start your PDP Membership now and get unlimited access plus you will get exclusive members-only features:
- - Customise your content feed by selecting your favourite topics
- - Save any articles, videos or session plans to view later
- - Exclusive members-only emails, events and offers
Already a member? Click here to sign in.