US-based coach, John O’Sullivan, founder of Changing the Game Project and best selling author, provides a perspective on the potential pitfalls of the US development model. As our ability to accurately measure players’ tangible development statistics improves, are we losing sight of the intangible factors which can’t always be measured? The cost of focussing exclusively on the numbers may be greater than we imagined.
In 2005, the coaches at one of the top English Premier League Youth Football Academies held one of their semi-annual meetings to decide upon which players they would keep for the upcoming cycle, and whom they would let go. As they were evaluating their players –many of whom would go on to star not only in the EPL, but internationally as well – they were stuck on one particular 15-year-old boy. He had been a good player when he first entered their Academy, but recently he had grown a bit and was no longer scoring well in their physical testing, nor playing like he had a few years earlier. In fact, the once speedy player was now only the seventh fastest kid on the team.
These incredibly qualified and highly respected coaches were torn; some wanted to keep him and offer him a scholarship to continue his training, others thought they should let him go. It was touch and go.
Adam Lallana; another product of the Southampton Academy. Photo: © Celsopupo | Dreamstime.com
To break the tie, the coaches brought in their chief scout, a man named Rod Ruddick, to help them decide. Ruddick was the scout who had found the boy play at age nine and had first invited him to join. He also had a hunch that the player was going through a difficult time as he grew, and that soon the kid he remembered would re-emerge. He cast his tie-breaking vote to keep the player.
Within two years the player would make his first-team senior debut for the club and become the youngest international player in his country’s history. In 2013, that speedy winger proved that the staff at Southampton were right to keep him, as he became the most expensive signing in world football history when he was bought by Real Madrid for USD$120 million. His name was Gareth Bale.
Would we keep a player who seemed to be declining in ability? Would we keep a player that did not help us win today?
The stories of Gareth Bale and other late developing athletes such as Danish international footballer Simon Kjaer, Michael Jordan or NFL quarterback Steve Young are worth retelling because they beg the question ‘Would these kids have made it today in the US?’
Thinking as a US coach, would we keep a player who seemed to be declining in ability? Would we keep a player that did not help us win ‘today’? Can we identify not just the talent that shines bright, but the talent that whispers?
Currently, in many places the answer is no, we would not keep a player who is not helping right now, because American youth sports is missing the most important prerequisite of talent development: patience.
…the US has created a system that goes against all the science and best practices of player development.
With the endless obsession for winning at younger and younger ages, and the accompanying cuts that go into forming select and all star teams at ages as young as seven, the US has created a system that goes against all the science and best practices of player development. That science says that children develop at different rates, and the best way to let the cream rise to the top is keep as many of them around as long as possible. Yet we do the exact opposite in our quest to win today. We select talent instead of identifying it.
We focus on today instead of tomorrow. We pick the biggest, fastest and strongest kids, focusing on athleticism instead of technique, grit and coachability. We get rid of kids who don’t help us win in the short- term. We celebrate team achievements at pre-pubescent ages, as if that has anything to do with long-term athletic development. We hold kids back from playing with a developmentally appropriate age group, instead keeping them so they can dominate – and we coaches can win – at a younger age.
Gareth Bale, Real Madrid vs Atle?tico Madrid, September, 2013. Photo: Laura Hale
In a nutshell, the needs of team success are put over the needs of individual player development and winning in the short-term is put ahead of individual long-term player needs. US coaches have lost the patience to develop players because we can get away with it. In the US, we are blessed with such huge numbers of athletes across a variety of sports. We can do a lot wrong and still compete on the international stage. Yet the world is catching up in sports the US has traditionally dominated, such as baseball, track and field, and basketball. In sports that we are newcomers to, such as football, countries such as Uruguay and Portugal, with only a small percentage of our population, are producing higher quality players and equal or better teams. Why? A variety of reasons to be sure, not the least of which is because they have the patience to develop talent.
The US development model’s biggest obstacle to patient talent development is the obsession with winning. I have met many coaches and clubs that tout their focus on player development who then proudly posts a picture of their eight-year-old state championship team on their website.
To produce these ‘winning’ teams, kids are cut from programs in elementary school, essentially being told they are not good enough. ‘A’ and ‘B’ teams are formed at seven or eight years old, and kids are locked into teams for an entire year, even though players this age can change so much in a month or two.
And who gets cut from these pre- pubescent teams? Usually the kids who were born more than six months after the arbitrary calendar cut-off are the ones who are let go. They are at a disadvantage through puberty because they are a little bit smaller, a little bit weaker, and slightly less mature. A few months can make a significant difference prior to their growth spurt; for example, a 13-year-old boy has a six-year developmental age swing, meaning he could have the body of a 10-year-old or a 16-year-old. If you want to make it as a youth player, you have a far greater likelihood of being selected to a top team if you are ‘old’ for your age. Of course, this is not just an American problem. In England, most Youth Academy players are born between September and December (age cut-off is September 1) while in Spain (January 1 cut-off) most are born between January and April.
If Scholes had been at a lesser club, they would have got rid of him and he would probably not be in the game now.
Talent identification is certainly not easy. Take, for example, retired Manchester United great Paul Scholes, of whom his future manager Sir Alex Ferguson said, after watching him in a youth game, ‘He has got no chance – he’s a midget.’ At age 16, Scholes struggled with asthma and injuries. He was technical and creative, but athletically he was behind the others. As Academy director Lev Kershaw stated:
‘He was a little one. He had asthma. No strength. No power. No athleticism. No endurance. “You’ve got a bleeding dwarf,” I remember somebody said to Brian Kidd [Former youth-team coach]. “You will eat your words,” said Kidd. If Scholes had been at a lesser club, they would have got rid of him and he would probably not be in the game now. We stuck with Scholes, a wonderful technician.’
Over the next 20 years, Scholes played over 700 games, scored over 150 goals, and won over 20 league championships, cups and two Champions League titles. He became arguably the best player of his generation, earning plaudits upon his retirement from every top player in the world. All of this only happened because Manchester United’s youth setup had patience.
Paul Scholes, Manchester United, August 2008. Photo: James Adams
American coaches need to practice this same patience. They need to let all their players play; if they pick them then play them! US coaches need to understand that development is not a straight line, and that kids will have good periods and bad ones. We need to know that not every child learns just because they are taught something; teaching and learning are not the same thing. We need to stop being in such a hurry to pick ‘elite’ teams and take the time to develop more players instead of a select few. The list goes on and on.
Parents, you need patience as well. The sky is not falling when your son or daughter does not make the top team at 9 years old.
Now I am certainly not casting all the blame on coaches who are in too much of a hurry – parents need patience as well. The sky is not falling when your son or daughter does not make the top team at nine years old. In fact, most sports organizations I know have a 75% turnover rate on their top team from age 11 to 18. The vast majority of the players in the ‘A’ group at age 10 will not be there in five or six years, so relax.
Actually, be glad. Your child is far better off being one of the top players on a ‘B’ team than sitting the bench on the top team. He or she needs to play. Winning championships does not matter much to a kid who played no part. If a young player is not injured and making a full commitment to attend training, they should be playing! If they are not playing at least half a game, you really should consider another team, because the one they are on is not concerned with everyone’s development.
Parents also need to be patient with coaches. Coaches have a tough job. Your child does not get 100% of their attention, they get 1/16 of it, or one divided by whatever number of kids is on the team. They will not see every little thing.
Learning does not happen overnight, and takes a variety of forms, so embrace change, be patient, and let it happen.
Great coaches will also push a child out of their comfort zone, and perhaps even make them unhappy once in a while. That is their job, because it promotes learning. A child needs to play different positions, they need to have different roles, and they need to both start and come off the bench. A youth team that has the same coach for 10 years is not a team that is developing players; it is embedding them in roles and a level of comfort that hinders development. Learning does not happen overnight, and takes a variety of forms, so embrace change, be patient, and let it happen.
Parents, one day you will look back on your child’s youth sports experience, and the things you will be thankful for are unlikely to be the U11 Joe Smith Super Duper Elite Cup championship. They will be the lessons your child learned from both good times and times of adversity. You will be thankful for the lessons your kids learned from being surrounded by positive adult role models, not the ones who only focused on the ‘now’.
You will look fondly upon the times your child struggled and overcame obstacles, the friends they made, and the positive memories that sport can bring. You will be thankful that you had the patience to take the good and the bad, and to let your child develop as children do – not in a straight line, but in a squiggly, messy line; improving, struggling, failing, moving on, and all the while on a journey with an unknown destination but with a well charted path of both success and failure.
If the US truly wants to be a country that develops talent, instead of churning through it and getting lucky that there are enough players to still compete at the end, then its time to start developing talent the right way.
It is time to practice patience.
Because the next Gareth Bale or Paul Scholes might be on your team, huffing and puffing, stumbling and failing,
and not yet showing signs of future greatness, yet bursting with talent just waiting to blossom. All they need is time.
For more about Changing the Game Project, click HERE.
Cover Image:
Gareth Bale Photo: Nathan Congleton
